01-20-2009 02:58 AM - edited 01-20-2009 03:04 AM
I know I dont speak for everyone here but in my opinion the next drives i get which will be for back up purposes would be WD drives.
Sorry seagate but if i were to buy another seagate drive i would have to flash it and i dont want keep on doing that.
i feel the same way, after this mess, i'm not bying any more seagate disk's for a while..
01-20-2009 02:59 AM
01-20-2009 03:09 AM - edited 01-20-2009 03:12 AM
Currently, very unimpressed. I opened a case Friday and as I did not get a reply in 24 hours I rang today to find out the status of my case. The support person I spoke to said she would send me a link to the solution and closed my case. Problem is the link is to the file that has been withdrawn, so no help whatsoever.
I have reopened the case and complained about lack of contact within 24 hrs (as promised) and sending me a link which could not resolve the problem.
So Seasgate drives are out 100% and I will use WD drives fom now on. I am just about to recommend drive types for some PC's to be built and that spec will now be WD, not seagate. I dont mind so much a manufacturer having a problem, but I think the way Seagate have handled this is pathetic, and very unprofessional.
And yes, I am angry....
Regards all.....
01-20-2009 04:19 AM
rod000 wrote:Currently, very unimpressed. I opened a case Friday and as I did not get a reply in 24 hours I rang today to find out the status of my case. The support person I spoke to said she would send me a link to the solution and closed my case. Problem is the link is to the file that has been withdrawn, so no help whatsoever.
I have reopened the case and complained about lack of contact within 24 hrs (as promised) and sending me a link which could not resolve the problem.
good luck. the 24 hour response time is a marketing scam. You have to wait at least 2-3 weeks if you want a response.
01-20-2009 06:23 AM
freestylegreek wrote:So far so good and no issues with the drive. I dont really notice any speed issues but then again im not like timing my hard drive on how long it takes to click on a folder or anything but its the same quickness as it once was.
Happy to hear that you got it working - at least somebody did. Btw, a big thanks goes to you, Ant and Fatlip for keeping the thread alive - I've been watching the issue for a few days now, but I was not able to login to the forum (my account didn't work).
I have a three weeks old ST31000333AS with SD35 (s/n 5TE0EAWM), so I still have to wait and see if it's affected ... hopefully it's not.
freestylegreek wrote:I know I dont speak for everyone here but in my opinion the next drives i get which will be for back up purposes would be WD drives.
Sorry seagate but if i were to buy another seagate drive i would have to flash it and i dont want keep on doing that.
I was a long-time user, supporter and recommender of Seagate drives (8+ years) ... and I'm afraid that I have to agree with you. This fiasco forced me to really consider using a NAS solution with RAID 1 or RAID 6, if possible with combined drives (i.e. Samsung+WD) ... it seems that one cannot rely on the quality of drives that we saw a few years ago.
Btw, I still have some faith in Seagate ... let's see how they manage to resolve this.
01-20-2009 05:44 PM
do NOT go through the firmware update as it will make your drive completely DEAD!
I now have a brick in my hand and Seagate wouldn't response for two days to my email.
01-21-2009 06:23 AM
01-21-2009 10:55 PM
Well it would be nice if Seagate sent everyone a short email explaining the (slow) progress.
Any manufacturer can have problems, it's the way they respond and fix the problems that is important. I would rate Seagates handling of this problem as very poor to put it politely.
And AlanM, nothing personal, but Seagate saying sorry doesn'e help very much!
01-22-2009 12:11 AM
Hix hix ! khỗ thân wá , Người VN ăn theo US jờ fải chạy theo nó , Vãi lol ..... cố chờ đợi
01-22-2009 12:17 AM
©2012 Seagate Technology LLC