Just to let you all how FAP 750 GB HD on eSATA compares to my new eSATA 1 TB HD (non Seagate)
before average 35 MB/sec - now 72.7 MB/sec
on USB 2.0 average 32 MB/sec - now 29 MB/sec (FAP did better when it worked at USB connection).
This speeds I am getting on old Pentium 4 - 1.7 MHz computer with PCI cards for eSATA, and USB 2.0.
I have second computer with Pentium Quad Q6700 - 2.6 MHz and got similar results.
I think that Seagate designed that way FAP, because drive would get to hot and to protect it self from damage shut down. Fan less sounds good, but with the drive of that capacity and files of big size, this design is flowed. No one need 750 GB HD to do small jobs, this HD has to work, but it can not. Plastic base with its electronics can not work properly, whole thing looks pretty, but is not able to perform.
What is sad that company like Seagate could produce this kind of product to the marked, if they would take few hundred people (power users) and gave them month to test this product they would know what they know now.
FAP is no go in real world.
Note to product development people from Seagate:
- plastic base - no go
- back connector USB and eSATA - no go (connector must be solid, well soldered to aluminium base and reinforced - people, this is HD is for external use, users will plug and plug this thing frequently.
- fan less - no go - heat not so good for HD - Seagate you know this...right?
- if you include light -make it useful- like show me when it works (now is just barely visible flickering glow in the middle of HD)
- on and off switch - must not be dependant of other electronics in external HD, must work all the time.
- and most important: when you sell product to not lie about its performance, anyone with basic HD test program can check this drive and compare with what you advertise.