12-08-2011 11:47 AM - edited 12-09-2011 07:45 AM
Hey,
I stumbled upon this blog post regarding the new MXT, and after watching the great video, I have questions. There is no mention on the number of repetition made before the recording, we all know that the MXT need a little bit of time to "learn". Also, on the application launch test, I'd like to know the total amount of data read. Finally, I was wondering why there was no comparison to a conventional 7200 RPM HD. Is it possible to post some of this information?
Thank you in advance,
Klok
edit: Seagate Youtube channel contain the comparison, but still no methodology
12-08-2011 12:08 PM
Klok wrote:Hey,
I stumbled upon this blog post regarding the new MXT, and after watching the great video, I have questions. There is no mention on the number of repetition made before the recording, we all know that the MXT need a little bit of time to "learn". Also, on the application launch test, I'd like to know the total amount of data read. Finally, I was wondering why there was no comparison to a conventional 7200 RPM HD. Is it possible to post some of this information?
Thank you in advance,
Klok
A similar video was in one of the review links previously posted.
There is no compare to the 7,200 conventional because... that is a foregone conclusion.
Suffice to say my old 7200 RPM was barely waking up on a single core machine in 1 minute booting.
On the unconditioned XT2 and XT drives, I am running a fraction of that.
12-08-2011 01:01 PM
Yes, I'm aware that we all know the result of the test, but at the same time they did compare it with a standard 5400 RPM. I think that i would have been a bit more appropriate to compare it with a 7200 RPM, as people with 5400 RPM HDD might think more about upgrading it to a 7200 RPM than the "SSHD". Again, just an opinion.
Klok
©2012 Seagate Technology LLC